On the bus ride home from work today I was thinking about a YA novel I read the other day and wanted to talk to someone about it. THEN I REMEMBERED I HAD A BEST FRIEND GETTING HER MASTER'S DEGREE IN KID'S LIT. What a coincidence!
ME: Have you read Paper Towns [by John Green] yet? I have thoughts I don't know what to do with.
FOX: Yes! I just finished yesterday!
ME: I finished Thursday night! *high five* Anyway, it is driving me crazy because there is so much I love about it -- but the central conceit drives me insane
ME: Like I realize the point is Green is PROBLEMITIZING the whole geek boy and his fetish for the mysterious/perfect/unattainable girl?
AMY: I was annoyed at the othering of female characters but I loved Lacey and Radar.
ME: but it's still geek boy and dream girl when you come down to it, you know? And I hate that with a passion. What is wrong with girls who aren't unique pefect mysterious snowflakes? Why is her existence still about Q?
AMY: IAWTC. I wish we saw more of the female friends he supposedly had.
ME: Basically, I loved the 11 Things with Margo, the entire road trip, and most of the Radar or Ben interactions.
AMY: "This is what hope tastes like!"
ME: I love it when we come to the same conclusion completely indepedently.
AMY: Me tooooo! &you;
So, yeah, 1) My Amy is the BEST Amy and you should all be jealous; b) John Green is a really good writer and the book is really good but I can't love it wholeheartedly because no matter how much you try to make the book about getting over being that creepy dude, you still have the creepiness as the weird nougaty center and it weirds me out. :/ Write me the Ben-and-Lacey or Radar-and-Angela story instead!
ME: Have you read Paper Towns [by John Green] yet? I have thoughts I don't know what to do with.
FOX: Yes! I just finished yesterday!
ME: I finished Thursday night! *high five* Anyway, it is driving me crazy because there is so much I love about it -- but the central conceit drives me insane
ME: Like I realize the point is Green is PROBLEMITIZING the whole geek boy and his fetish for the mysterious/perfect/unattainable girl?
AMY: I was annoyed at the othering of female characters but I loved Lacey and Radar.
ME: but it's still geek boy and dream girl when you come down to it, you know? And I hate that with a passion. What is wrong with girls who aren't unique pefect mysterious snowflakes? Why is her existence still about Q?
AMY: IAWTC. I wish we saw more of the female friends he supposedly had.
ME: Basically, I loved the 11 Things with Margo, the entire road trip, and most of the Radar or Ben interactions.
AMY: "This is what hope tastes like!"
ME: I love it when we come to the same conclusion completely indepedently.
AMY: Me tooooo! &you;
So, yeah, 1) My Amy is the BEST Amy and you should all be jealous; b) John Green is a really good writer and the book is really good but I can't love it wholeheartedly because no matter how much you try to make the book about getting over being that creepy dude, you still have the creepiness as the weird nougaty center and it weirds me out. :/ Write me the Ben-and-Lacey or Radar-and-Angela story instead!
Tags:
(no subject)
18/1/09 05:20 (UTC)(no subject)
18/1/09 05:34 (UTC)(no subject)
18/1/09 05:44 (UTC)As you know.
(no subject)
18/1/09 06:49 (UTC)(no subject)
18/1/09 07:03 (UTC)(no subject)
18/1/09 15:47 (UTC)(no subject)
18/1/09 08:00 (UTC)1. John Green addressed this, the "panic pixie dreamgirl" aspect of Paper Towns on his blog in a fabulous essay: On the Destruction of Manic Pixie Dreamgirls (http://www.sparksflyup.com/2008/10/on-destruction-of-manic-pixie-dream.php).
2. I think that this has never bothered me as much as when I read his novella/short story in Let it Snow where he has all the hallmarks of the MPDG but none of the room to flesh out either the character or the narrative and both suffer terribly from it.
Oh, and, also, I would TOTES read the Radar and Angela story. And I hope we don't lose John Green to Hollywood (now that he is writing the screenplay for Paper Towns) like we did Rob "90210" Thomas.
(no subject)
18/1/09 15:46 (UTC)