Page Summary
ekaterinn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
norah.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pearl-o.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pearl-o.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bethbethbeth.livejournal.com - (no subject)
claire.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bethbethbeth.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dirty-diana.livejournal.com - (no subject)
brooklinegirl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
spainja.livejournal.com - (no subject)
spainja.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pearl-o.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pearl-o.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pearl-o.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pearl-o.livejournal.com - (no subject)
thefourthvine.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pearl-o.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Page generated 17/1/26 08:03
Style Credit
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
(no subject)
22/10/04 20:23 (UTC)(no subject)
22/10/04 20:27 (UTC)(no subject)
22/10/04 20:39 (UTC)(no subject)
22/10/04 20:40 (UTC)(no subject)
22/10/04 21:08 (UTC):::worries about self:::
(no subject)
22/10/04 21:44 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 04:49 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 06:37 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 07:13 (UTC)So. Yes. *smooch*
(no subject)
23/10/04 07:54 (UTC)I didn't like Fraser's hair in season 2 as much--in some episodes, especially "The Edge", it looks poofy. Season 1 Fraser, though--god, between the short hair and the brown uniform and the earnest-naivete-that-hadn't-yet -been-crushed-by-that-whole-Victoria-mess--god, you just want to lick him....
Meg, on the other hand, looks better with long hair.
(no subject)
23/10/04 07:55 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 08:35 (UTC)Although, you know, I think for these kind of questions you have to, like, average out the hotness over the season. When you're looking at a broad expanse of time, I'd think consistency of hotness would be more important than individual spikes. And individual episodes could be another poll. Hmmmm.
(no subject)
23/10/04 08:35 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 08:38 (UTC)Well, this is totally true. My only excuse is that I totally underestimated just how many fans found Diefenbaker attractive, I guess. (I thought that'd be kind of a joky ticky box, frankly. I mean, I love him, but I didn't feel a need to include him on the sliding scale of hotness.)
(no subject)
23/10/04 08:39 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 10:51 (UTC)Yes, it's sad. But if I can't admit to sad preoccupations on LJ, where can I? (And, so you don't answer, "therapy," I will modify that: where can I that's free?)
(no subject)
23/10/04 12:52 (UTC)Pssssh, no, I totally agree. That's what livejournal is for.