One of my "Fraser! Hot!" posts last week was actually inspired by me looking for screencaps trying to demonstrate Thatcher's increased hotness in season 2. But, uh, then I got distracted instead.
Vecchio is most attractive *specifically* in The Deal, which is what I just expounded upon to the girls, and they all said, "SHUT UP AND LEAVE IT IN A COMMENT YOU HOR!"
Awwww. It sounds like you're having a great time! *smooch*
Although, you know, I think for these kind of questions you have to, like, average out the hotness over the season. When you're looking at a broad expanse of time, I'd think consistency of hotness would be more important than individual spikes. And individual episodes could be another poll. Hmmmm.
Fraser and Ray V are definately hotter with shorter hair. Vecchio in particular looked much better after he finally stopped fighting Mother Nature and got rid of that patch of hair up top. He looked less goofy afterwards. Plus his outfits became less flamboyant--he was wearing more black and tan, rather than those god-ugly shirts. Actually, it kinda seems like he grew up by season 2--he was more serious. I guess shooting your best friend in the back and beating the crap out of your childhood nemesis will do that to you.
I didn't like Fraser's hair in season 2 as much--in some episodes, especially "The Edge", it looks poofy. Season 1 Fraser, though--god, between the short hair and the brown uniform and the earnest-naivete-that-hadn't-yet -been-crushed-by-that-whole-Victoria-mess--god, you just want to lick him....
Meg, on the other hand, looks better with long hair.
Oh, and you so should have included Dief--his appearance changed the most of all the characters!
Well, this is totally true. My only excuse is that I totally underestimated just how many fans found Diefenbaker attractive, I guess. (I thought that'd be kind of a joky ticky box, frankly. I mean, I love him, but I didn't feel a need to include him on the sliding scale of hotness.)
I've never seen the show at all, but I had to respond to the poll solely so I could vote for Diefenbaker. I've actually spent time studying screen caps of him. ("Huh. Look at those ears. There's a dog who is listening to something just outside the camera's range." "Hey, I know how they trained him for that shot!" "Wow, look at that body language. He must really like that actor." And so on, ad nauseum.)
Yes, it's sad. But if I can't admit to sad preoccupations on LJ, where can I? (And, so you don't answer, "therapy," I will modify that: where can I that's free?)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
22/10/04 20:23 (UTC)(no subject)
22/10/04 20:40 (UTC)(no subject)
22/10/04 20:27 (UTC)(no subject)
22/10/04 20:39 (UTC)(no subject)
22/10/04 21:08 (UTC):::worries about self:::
(no subject)
22/10/04 21:44 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 04:49 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 08:35 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 06:37 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 08:39 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 07:13 (UTC)So. Yes. *smooch*
(no subject)
23/10/04 08:35 (UTC)Although, you know, I think for these kind of questions you have to, like, average out the hotness over the season. When you're looking at a broad expanse of time, I'd think consistency of hotness would be more important than individual spikes. And individual episodes could be another poll. Hmmmm.
(no subject)
23/10/04 07:54 (UTC)I didn't like Fraser's hair in season 2 as much--in some episodes, especially "The Edge", it looks poofy. Season 1 Fraser, though--god, between the short hair and the brown uniform and the earnest-naivete-that-hadn't-yet -been-crushed-by-that-whole-Victoria-mess--god, you just want to lick him....
Meg, on the other hand, looks better with long hair.
(no subject)
23/10/04 07:55 (UTC)(no subject)
23/10/04 08:38 (UTC)Well, this is totally true. My only excuse is that I totally underestimated just how many fans found Diefenbaker attractive, I guess. (I thought that'd be kind of a joky ticky box, frankly. I mean, I love him, but I didn't feel a need to include him on the sliding scale of hotness.)
(no subject)
23/10/04 10:51 (UTC)Yes, it's sad. But if I can't admit to sad preoccupations on LJ, where can I? (And, so you don't answer, "therapy," I will modify that: where can I that's free?)
(no subject)
23/10/04 12:52 (UTC)Pssssh, no, I totally agree. That's what livejournal is for.