It occurs to me that it's been a couple weeks since I made a "OMG SO HOT!!!!" post. Which is just wrong on any number of levels. Because, dude. The hotness? Has not decreased in any way.
So tonight I went over to callumkeithrennie.net and started looking through their wonderful, wonderful screencaps (newly dvd-ed). And ... dude, I know I write raptures about s1 and s2 Fraser all the time, but s3 Fraser has his charms, too.
Mmmmmm. Scruffy, scruffy charms. These are good to keep in mind reading
_aerye_'s random porn encouragement in
estrella30's lj this morning.
And, of course, no one can deny the hotness that is Ray Kowalski. I may have a couple of kinks where he's concerned.
But really, when you come down to it? Two hotnesses that are even hotter together.
So tonight I went over to callumkeithrennie.net and started looking through their wonderful, wonderful screencaps (newly dvd-ed). And ... dude, I know I write raptures about s1 and s2 Fraser all the time, but s3 Fraser has his charms, too.
Mmmmmm. Scruffy, scruffy charms. These are good to keep in mind reading
And, of course, no one can deny the hotness that is Ray Kowalski. I may have a couple of kinks where he's concerned.
But really, when you come down to it? Two hotnesses that are even hotter together.
(no subject)
18/11/04 23:28 (UTC)Well. I believe my monitor is on fire. *fans screen* And your RayK kinks seem to be contagious, good grief! From this time forth, boys with guns? Are as absolutely nothing before the boy with guns and glasses.
(no subject)
19/11/04 04:35 (UTC)omg yes! you pinned it down! it's not just his adorable dorky glasses - it's the combination of the glasses and guns and - yeah. Man. *heart*
(*whispers: also, don't forget the beauty of his hands (http://members.tripod.com/~happyfriendbox//rayshands.html)*) (http://members.tripod.com/happyfriendbox/ray_running.jpg)
*ded of HOTT*
19/11/04 23:21 (UTC)...I have to go lie down.
*is overwhelmed*
Re: *ded of HOTT*
20/11/04 20:33 (UTC)I have kind of (*koff*) a thing for Callum's hands. I'm really very subtle about it.
Re: *ded of HOTT*
20/11/04 22:28 (UTC)...Er. Oh. Subtle, yes. Absolutely.