post script script?
14/1/05 15:01I keep reading more of
nostalgia_lj's anonymous comments post, and I keep getting more and more MOST FAVORITES. There are really an amazing amount of stupid, funny, or bizarre people and opinions out there.
Still, though, I think this one holds a special place in my heart. Honestly, how did I go so long without knowing what is apparently basic syntax?
Apparently I now need to go through all my stories and try and figure out who is the dominant and/or topping character in each one. I'm uncertain if it's mostly or entirely a matter of the ass sex, or force of personality.
Also, I'm a little unclear about whether the dominant/submissive part or the male/female part is the overreaching one in the poster's vision. What if it's het with the girl topping, I mused to
fox1013 and
dsudis?
Fox said, "OMG GIRLS DON'T TOP WTF!!!1"
Dira said, "Duh THAT IS NOT POSSIBLE. GENDER ROLES, PEOPLE."
I said, "...Oh." And then I hid my wife-fucking-her-husband-up-the-ass fic in the corner and whistled innocently.
On an unrelated note, this Series of Unfortunate Events incest ficlet was so good it made me making little squeeble noises.
Still, though, I think this one holds a special place in my heart. Honestly, how did I go so long without knowing what is apparently basic syntax?
Apparently I now need to go through all my stories and try and figure out who is the dominant and/or topping character in each one. I'm uncertain if it's mostly or entirely a matter of the ass sex, or force of personality.
Also, I'm a little unclear about whether the dominant/submissive part or the male/female part is the overreaching one in the poster's vision. What if it's het with the girl topping, I mused to
Fox said, "OMG GIRLS DON'T TOP WTF!!!1"
Dira said, "Duh THAT IS NOT POSSIBLE. GENDER ROLES, PEOPLE."
I said, "...Oh." And then I hid my wife-fucking-her-husband-up-the-ass fic in the corner and whistled innocently.
On an unrelated note, this Series of Unfortunate Events incest ficlet was so good it made me making little squeeble noises.
(no subject)
16/1/05 15:24 (UTC)but I totally have to go reread your peter/logan now. heh.