schmerica: (school)
[personal profile] schmerica
The introduction for the logic problem I am working on right now (#1 from Penny Press World-Class Logic Problems, Autumn 2003):

Every Thursday, five friends meet at the Cover to Cover bookstore for their amateur writers' group, where they trade stories and offer each other helpful criticism. One week, the five (two of whom--Adam and Neil--are men, and three of whom--Faith, Holly and Rhonda--are women) felt a collective case of writer's block, so they gave themselves a little creative assignment to try to shake it off. Each person was to come up with a story that encompassed characters from famous books. The next week, the five returned to the group energized and ready to discuss their stories. Each person wrote a narrative in whcih a different well-known literary hero (Holden Caulfield, Martin Chuzzlewit, Natty Bumppo, Rhett Butler, or Tom Jones) meets a different literary heroine (Anna Karenina, Emma Bovary, Hester Prynne, Jane Eyre, or Tess Durbeyfield). No two stories have the same title (one is entitled "For Keeps"). While these stories aren't exactly literary canon, the five agree that they sure were a blast to write! From the information provided, can you determine the author of each story, as well as the famous literary hero and heroine featured in it?

Hee. Hee hee hee.

(no subject)

30/3/05 05:45 (UTC)
ext_108: Jules from Psych saying "You guys are thinking about cupcakes, aren't you?" (bats: mary sue is the best het)
Posted by [identity profile] liviapenn.livejournal.com

Rhett Butler/Hester Prynne = MY NEW OTP

(no subject)

30/3/05 06:15 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] pearl-o.livejournal.com
No, LOSER. Rhett Butler was in the crossover with Anna Karenina. I mean, DUH.

I like the Jane Eyre/Holden Caulfield pairing, myself.

(no subject)

30/3/05 06:33 (UTC)
ext_108: Jules from Psych saying "You guys are thinking about cupcakes, aren't you?" (dc: barry allen = sexy nerd)
Posted by [identity profile] liviapenn.livejournal.com

Hey, if i had the clues, I would TOTALLY have worked that out, because I am a MASTER OF LOGIC, so shut your face. :-P

(Man, Jane would lock *Holden* in the attic.)

(no subject)

30/3/05 15:29 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] pearl-o.livejournal.com
You and your EXCUSES. Whatever, loser.

(Dude, who wouldn't lock Holden in the attic?)

(no subject)

31/3/05 04:51 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] executrix.livejournal.com
Even if there was a possibility of taking a walk that day, you couldn't wipe out even half the "Fuck You" signs if you tried.

Reader, I pushed him over a cliff. Him and his kid sister Phoebe. And nobody caught him.

(no subject)

31/3/05 12:48 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] executrix.livejournal.com
The "Shag, Marry, or Push Over a Cliff Notes" version.

(no subject)

30/3/05 06:17 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] sophia-helix.livejournal.com
Hee!

Er...was there more to the problem? I enjoy logic problems, but I've been staring at it for several minutes going "From...the...information...provided?" *g*

(no subject)

30/3/05 06:24 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] pearl-o.livejournal.com
Hee! Um, yes. I only gave the introductory paragraph thing at the top of the page. I am waaaay too lazy to type up the rest, but the rest of the problem and all the clues were there, too.

(no subject)

30/3/05 06:36 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] sophia-helix.livejournal.com
I never knew until I spent two months studying for the LSAT that I love logic problems. Of course, I will never use that knowledge IN law school, but I sure enjoyed the "Games" section.

(no subject)

30/3/05 06:40 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_divya_/
felt a collective case of writer's block, so they

...gave up and went out for a drink?

Hmm, maybe it's not such a mystery as to why I don't write fanfic. Too drunk most of the time. Not that that stops everyone, mind you.

Hee. Hee hee hee.

Hee, I agree.

(no subject)

30/3/05 19:14 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] pearl-o.livejournal.com
*giggles some more*

(no subject)

30/3/05 06:52 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] speshope.livejournal.com
Chuzzlewith. Heh.

(no subject)

30/3/05 15:30 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] pearl-o.livejournal.com
Hee. When I got your comment I thought I had made a typo and you were mocking it, but no! It was your typo! I win. *grins*

(We're still on for two, right? Did I tell you my mother gave me twenty bucks to give you?)

(no subject)

30/3/05 17:02 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] speshope.livejournal.com
I typoed! Oops. I was so amused by the name my fingers must have gotten away with me.

(Yes. Outside the Subway. And no! Wow. So much.Did I tell you I got horrifically lost after I left your house?)

(no subject)

30/3/05 14:57 (UTC)
ext_841: (grin)
Posted by [identity profile] cathexys.livejournal.com
oh that's beautiful...we're *everywhere*!!

(of course the test is utterly heteronormative, b/c the number of permutations would be greatly increased with f/f m/m and threesomes :-) and who wouldn't want to see emma/tess???

(no subject)

30/3/05 15:34 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] pearl-o.livejournal.com
(of course the test is utterly heteronormative,

Oh, no, it completely is. It'd be hard to make up the grid for other permutations, of course, but it'd certainly be just as interesting. (A more complex version of the problem -- end of the book difficulty instead of beginning of the book -- could have had each male meeting with a different male, each female meeting with a different female, and each male meetinfg with a different female).

Also, I must admit, I've never read Hardy or Flaubert.