Hee, I think I've had at least three different people offer me disks, but I am much too impatient for mail! Spes is right here, and has everything but episode 6, so I'm good. Thank you!
(Also, I didn't give feedback on your fic the other day, but I totally loved it. With the sleepiness! Which is, hi, one of my really weird and non-sexual bulletproof kinks! Yay!)
...now I have this mental image of Charlie and Don using "less than three" as code for "I love you" - Don turns away to leave and Charlie calls after him "Two point nine eight nine!" and Don glances over his shoulder and says, "Zero," with a wink.
...also, it occurs to me that I should probably point you to the extended version (http://www.livejournal.com/users/dsudis/220125.html), since I blamed you for it by name and all...
I loaded it onto my Palm last night and read it this morning.
And I absolutely love how they never say what it means. It's like the perfect code is one that doesn't look like a code. And they're all about appearances in this piece, aren't they?
I ____ \/1.1 U
(in an fanfictional cupboard love sort of way, of course)
I love how obvious it is that Don and Charlie love each other, without being blatant in that obnoxious American TV way. Like when Don told Charlie about the radioactive material being hijacked, Charlie's first question was "Were you exposed?" and not something like "What are the hijackers going to do with it?" Or that wonderful scene at the end of one of the episodes (can't remember which) where Don invites Charlie to watch a baseball game with him, and they just talk about everything *except* how important this obviously is to Charlie, who has tears in his eyes. Woobies!
(no subject)
16/5/05 04:44 (UTC)How are your transfers going? Do you need a disk? I'm happy to help if you do. Just let me know!
(no subject)
16/5/05 05:42 (UTC)(Also, I didn't give feedback on your fic the other day, but I totally loved it. With the sleepiness! Which is, hi, one of my really weird and non-sexual bulletproof kinks! Yay!)
(no subject)
16/5/05 05:04 (UTC)(no subject)
16/5/05 05:06 (UTC)(no subject)
16/5/05 05:40 (UTC)(no subject)
16/5/05 05:42 (UTC)(no subject)
16/5/05 11:14 (UTC)(no subject)
16/5/05 12:38 (UTC)*LOVES*
(no subject)
16/5/05 15:25 (UTC)(no subject)
16/5/05 16:02 (UTC)(no subject)
17/5/05 12:40 (UTC)...also, it occurs to me that I should probably point you to the extended version (http://www.livejournal.com/users/dsudis/220125.html), since I blamed you for it by name and all...
(no subject)
17/5/05 20:01 (UTC)(no subject)
16/5/05 22:44 (UTC)I do believe you win the fandom.
Please collect your prize.
(And see if you can avoid having the rest of us rip you apart. Hey, it'll be good exercise!)
(no subject)
17/5/05 12:37 (UTC)Did you see the extended remix? (http://www.livejournal.com/users/dsudis/220125.html)
(no subject)
17/5/05 17:13 (UTC)I loaded it onto my Palm last night and read it this morning.
And I absolutely love how they never say what it means. It's like the perfect code is one that doesn't look like a code. And they're all about appearances in this piece, aren't they?
I ____
\/1.1
U
(in an fanfictional cupboard love sort of way, of course)
(no subject)
18/5/05 16:09 (UTC)Thanks!
(no subject)
16/5/05 12:56 (UTC)(no subject)
16/5/05 15:25 (UTC)(no subject)
16/5/05 15:45 (UTC)(no subject)
16/5/05 21:08 (UTC)